Date:
Fri, 24 Mar 2006 07:36:00 -0500
From:
David Cheifetz
Subject:
A Question on Consent
It
seems to me that, in some cases, the line between consent and provocation
will be very very fine. If provocation can be used to reduce the
damages, the judge may be able to fashion an appropriate remedy
(or a remedy the judge feels appropriate) - that is, a reduction
that the judge feels is the proper amount. Could there be 100% provocation?
I shouldn't think so as wouldn't that be tantamount to a consent
defence?
David
Cheifetz
<<<<
Previous Message ~ Index ~ Next
Message >>>>>
|