ODG archive
 

ODG front page

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Search ODG site

   

 

Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 13:40:17 -0600

From: Lewis Klar

Subject: Childs v. Desormeaux

 

I should also resist judgment-anticipation, but Stephen's theory needs some refinement. As he would undoubtedly agree, most activities or decisions not to act create foreseeable risks of injury to others. One is liable however only if that act was done negligently ( eg was the planning, organizing and hosting of the party done in a negligent manner?). Also many people are in a "relationship" with drunks which allow them to influence their conduct (friends, other people at party, etc.). Do these people owe a duty?

I think it would be a novel duty, unless the SCC is prepared to concede that the serving of alcohol by anyone to anyone is itself an unreasonable act which requires reasonable follow up acts to prevent harm. Maybe they will decide that, and maybe they should. But in my opinion that is what it should take.

Should be interesting,

 

Lewis Klar
Professor of Law
University of Alberta

>>> Stephen Pitel 05/02/06 12:23 PM >>>

I'm sorry, but in a heightened state of judgment-anticipation I can't resist. I hope Vaughan's prediction is wrong. Childs v. Desormeaux does not involve a novel duty of care. Planning, organizing and hosting an alcohol-related event creates a foreseeable risk of physical injury to guests and others, including users of the road. Further, social hosts put themselves into a relationship with their guests which gives them the ability to take reasonable steps to influence their conduct, such as making inquiries into their fitness to drive and attempting to dissuade them from driving. On either of these bases (especially the former) - actions giving risk to a foreseeable risk of physical injury or the duty to control in instances of a special relationship - the social host situation falls within two well-established categories of duty of care, as outlined expressly in Cooper v. Hobart. There should be no need to treat the case as involving a novel duty.

 

 


<<<< Previous Message  ~  Index  ~  Next Message >>>>>


 

 
Webspace provided by UCC
  »
»
»
»
»
  Comments and suggestions are welcome - contact s.hedley@ucc.ie