Date: 24 July 2006 13:32:15

From: Jason Neyers

Subject: Extreme prolixity of the High Court of Australia

I post this on behalf of Jane Stapleton:

Dear Colleagues:

I am trying to find the most extreme example of the prolixity of the High Court of Australia in a tort case: any suggestions? I seem to remember one had over 600 footnotes ... or was that just a nightmare!

Also am I right or wrong to think there is no such parallel elsewhere, such as in the Supreme Court of Canada?

Any help will be most gratefully received!

Jane

<<<< Previous Message  ~  Index  ~  Next Message >>>>>