ODG archive
 

ODG front page

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Search ODG site

   

 

Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 07:25:39 -0500

From: Jason Neyers

Subject: Defamation and compensation for enrichment

 

Dear Mårten:

At the level of principle, I would think that the plaintiff should get gain-based damages as outlined in Rookes, but the reason for it is not punishment. Rather it is due to the fact that the defendant has stolen the plaintiff's reputation and converted it into cash. As between the two, the plaintiff has the entitlement to this gain (it was his reputation) and therefore he is entitled to the cash, as a matter of compensation not punishment. There is an interesting article that deals with these issues called "Restitutionary Damages as Corrective Justice by Weinrib (in Theoretical Inquiries in Law journal) and a book by Edelman called Gain-based Damages.

 

----- Original Message -----
From: KA Oliphant
Date: Thursday, November 2, 2006 6:51 am
Subject: Re: ODG: Defamation and compensation for enrichment
To: Mårten Schultz

Hi Mårten

Welcome to the list. Good to spread the geographical diversity of list members. Looking forward to hearing more about topical issues in Swedish tort law.

On the issue you raised, English law wouldn't award restitutionary damages, but punitive damages could well be available and - as has often been remarked - their effect (perhaps even their purpose) may be to strip the wrongdoer of his ill-gotten gain. In fact, punitive damages in the English common law are available are available only in the following two situations: (1) oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional action by the servants of the government, and (2) where the defendant's conduct has been calculated by him to make a profit for himself which may well exceed the compensation payable to the plaintiff (Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 at 1226, per Lord Devlin). In considering the latter category, Devlin specifically referred to damages for libel - "one man should not be allowed to sell another man's reputation for profit" - and concluded: "it is necessary to teach a wrongdoer that tort does not pay" (p. 1227).

 

--
Jason Neyers
January Term Director
Associate Professor of Law
Faculty of Law
University of Western Ontario
N6A 3K7
(519) 661-2111 x. 88435

 


<<<< Previous Message  ~  Index  ~  Next Message >>>>>


 

 
Webspace provided by UCC
  »
»
»
»
»
  Comments and suggestions are welcome - contact s.hedley@ucc.ie