Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:58

From: Jason Neyers

Subject: Quinn v Leathem

Dear Colleagues:

I just had the (dis)pleasure of reading Quinn v. Leathem in depth for the first time and I found it to be one of the most poorly reasoned classic cases that I have ever read. Does anyone know of any contemporaneous discussions of the case that were hostile to the reasoning in the decision? The one that I have found in the LQR written by an A.V.D. is (I think strangely) quite glowing in its praise.

Cheers,

--
Jason Neyers
January Term Director
Associate Professor of Law
Faculty of Law
University of Western Ontario
N6A 3K7
(519) 661-2111 x. 88435

<<<< Previous Message  ~  Index  ~  Next Message >>>>>