Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:06

From: Geoff McLay

Subject: Quinn v Leathem

There is a lot also about the case that assumes its correctness in Salmond 2nd ed 500-505, who while he might have been a fan of imperial union, was not that well disposed to the working class variety either. Interestingly Salmond remains it seems influential in the tort of conspiracy.

Geoff

-----Original Message-----
From: Hector MacQueen
Sent: Wednesday, 25 April 2007 8:49 p.m.
To: Robert Stevens
Subject: Re: ODG: Quinn v Leathem

So I have always understood. He was however an enthusiast for the Anglo-Scottish Union, so in that sense at least he was a unionist!

<<<< Previous Message  ~  Index  ~  Next Message >>>>>