Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:03
From: Anthony de Garr Robinson
Subject: Duty to Warn
The ambiguity inherent in the word "concealment" was why I used the word non-disclosure in my question. I had assumed that if Lewis had meant "deceit", he would have said "deceit", not "fraudulent concealment".
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Dickinson
Sent: 07 October 2008 09:55
Subject: RE: ODG: Duty to Warn
Concealment involves a positive misrepresentation - Gordon v Selico Co Ltd and Another [1986] EGLR 71. It is different from a mere failure to disclose, and is capable of supporting an action in deceit.
<<<<
Previous Message ~ Index ~ Next
Message >>>>>
|