From: Jason W Neyers
<jneyers@uwo.ca>
Sent: Tuesday 10 September 2024
00:17
To: brandon.stewart@uts.edu.au;
obligations
Subject: RE: Australian negligence
law - unique
How about
the differences between negligently supplied building structures: ie Winnipeg
Condo and Brookfield Multiplex and the differences in the recovery
of relational economic loss which differs in the 3 jurisdictions at a certain
level of generality.
Jason Neyers
Professor of Law
Faculty of Law
Western University
Law Building Rm 26
e. jneyers@uwo.ca
t. 519.661.2111 (x88435)
From: Brandon D. Stewart <Brandon.Stewart@uts.edu.au>
Sent: September 9, 2024 6:41 PM
To: obligations <obligations@uwo.ca>
Subject: Australian negligence law - unique
|
Some people who received this message don't often get email from brandon.stewart@uts.edu.au. Learn why this is
important |
Dear all,
I’m
conducting a study of HCA negligence decisions since 2010. As part of the
study, I’m compiling a list of aspects of Australian negligence law that are
unique relative to Canada and the UK (and sometimes other common law/civil
jurisdictions) during my study period. I’m focusing on the common law, not the
state civil liability legislation. So far I have advocate’s immunity and
(arguably) the salient features approach to novel duties (but not really its
content).
Is anyone
aware of any other examples (even prior to 2010)?
Many
thanks!
Dr.
Brandon D. Stewart, J.D., LL.M., J.S.D.
Lecturer
Faculty of
Law
University
of Technology Sydney
PO Box 123
Broadway NSW 2007 Australia
uts.edu.au
UTS CRICOS Provider Code: 00099F
DISCLAIMER: This email message and any accompanying attachments may contain
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read,
use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
this message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority, states them to
be the views of the University of Technology Sydney. Before opening any
attachments, please check them for viruses and defects. Think. Green. Do.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
|
|
|
|
|
You're receiving
this message because you're a member of the obligations group from The
University of Western Ontario. To take part in this conversation, reply all
to this message. |
|
|
|
| Learn more
about Microsoft 365 Groups |
|
|