The Oxford University
Comparative Law Forum has just published an article which discusses
unjust factors v
absence of basis:
Chris Hunt,
Unjust
Enrichment Understood as Absence of Basis: a Critical Evaluation with
Lessons from Canada
OUCLF, which runs a
free
subscription service, has previously published the following
articles on unjust enrichment:
Peter
Birks:
At
the Expense of the Claimant: Direct and
Indirect
Enrichment in English Law
Mindy
Chen-Wishart:
In
Defence of
Unjust Factors:
a study of rescission for duress, fraud and exploitation
Thomas
Krebs:
In
Defence of Unjust Factors
Gerhard
Dannemann:
Illegality
as
Defence Against
Unjust Enrichment Claims
William
Swadling:
The
Role of
Illegality in the
English Law of Unjust Enrichment
Lionel
Smith:
Property,
Subsidiarity, and Unjust
Enrichment
Simon
Whittaker:
Performance
of
Another's
Obligation: French and English Law Contrasted
Francesco
Giglio:
Restitution
for Wrongs: a Comparative
Analysis
Peter
Schlechtriem:
Privacy,
Publicity and
Restitution of Wrongful Gains: Another New Economy?
Armin
Hadjiani:
Duress
and Undue
Influence in
English and German Contract Law: a comparative study on vitiating
factors in common and civil law
Duncan
Sheehan,
Unjust Factors or Restitution of Transfers Sine Causa
Happy reading!
Gerhard Dannemann
--
Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dannemann
Centre for British Studies
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Mohrenstr. 60
10117 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 2093 99048
Fax +49 30 2093 99055
http://www2.hu-berlin.de/gbz
====
This message was delivered through the Restitution Discussion Group,
an international internet LISTSERV devoted to all aspects of the law
of unjust enrichment. To subscribe, send "subscribe enrichment" in
the body of a message to <listserv@lists.mcgill.ca>. To unsubscribe,
send "signoff enrichment" to the same address. To make a posting to
all group members, send to <enrichment@lists.mcgill.ca>. The list is
run by Lionel Smith of McGill University, <lionel.smith@mcgill.ca>.