|
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:07:09 -0500 From: Jason Neyers Subject: Comparative Law
My apologies for the double post to RDG and ODG members: For those interested in comparative law there are some interesting articles on global jurist: see "The Canadian Constructive Trust and the French Negotiorum Gestio: Two Institutions Serving one Same Legal Concept ?" at http://www.bepress.com/gj/advances/vol3/iss3/art3; and "The Protection of the Weak Contractual Party in Italy vs. United States Doctrine of Unconscionability. A Comparative Analysis" at http://www.bepress.com/gj/advances/vol3/iss3/art2. The House of Lords has also recently released a decision dealing with the Scottish law of trusts in relation to claims in bankruptcy and the "unjust enrichment" that this might cause, see Burnett's Trustee (Respondent) v. Grainger and another (Appellants) http://www.publications.parliament.uk/ pa/ld200304/ldjudgmt/jd040304/burnet-1.htm. The facts were as follows: A, the owner, sells her flat to B and C. B and C pay the price to A and, in return, she delivers the relevant title documents to them. B and C take possession of the flat, but do not record their title in the register. A goes bankrupt and, on the basis that the flat remains part of her estate at the date of the bankruptcy, the trustee, who knows of the disposition to B and C, records a notice of title to the flat in the register. B and C then record their title. The House of Lords held that the trustee's title is to be preferred and that he can evict B and C from the flat without repaying the price since time of registry is the criteria of true ownership. Should there be some sort of remedy for B and C? Would there be a claim in the English or Canadian version of unjust enrichment?
Cheers, --
<<<< Previous Message ~ Index ~ Next Message >>>>>
|
»
»
»
»