Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:51:32 -0500

From: Jason Neyers

Subject: Zhu v. NSW

Dear Colleagues:

I was wondering if anyone has any reaction to the High Court's ruling in Zhu v. NSW that in order for justification to count as a defence in inducement cases it must constitute protection of a superior right (proprietary or quasi-proprietary) not merely another contractual right which was first in time. My gut reaction is that this seems problematic (and against some Canadian authority) but I was wondering what others thought.

Cheers,

--
Jason Neyers
January Term Director
Assistant Professor of Law
Faculty of Law
University of Western Ontario
N6A 3K7
(519) 661-2111 x. 88435

<<<< Previous Message  ~  Index  ~  Next Message >>>>>