Date:
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:18:28
From:
Robert Stevens
Subject:
Two Questions
I
have two questions which I cannot answer for myself arising from
what I am working on. Any help, offlist if preferred, gratefully
accepted.
Problem
One
We
have recently discussed an employer's vicarious liability for exemplary
damages and vicarious liability for an employee's obligation to
make restitution of a gain made by the employee.
Are
there any cases where an employee, acting in the course of employment,
commits a tort which results in a gain for the employer but not
the employee? Is the employer obliged to make restitution? In principle
I think the answer should, generally, be yes, if this is the sort
of tort which permits of this response but are there any cases?
Problem
Two
In
a claim for contribution between two careless tortfeasors, does
the court apply the same test in determining relative 'fault' as
it would in deciding whether the tort has been committed? So, if
two drivers D1 and D2 both carelessly cause a car accident which
results in injuries to P, could D1 argue that she was a learner
driver whilst D2 was a professional chauffeur so that the contribution
as between the two of them should not be equal? Or, as between D1
and D2 do we apply the objective standard which we would apply in
the claim by P against either one of them? Cases?
Robert
Stevens
Barrister
University of Oxford
<<<<
Previous Message ~ Index ~ Next
Message >>>>>
|