Date:
Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:44:30 +0000 (GMT)
From:
Jason Neyers
Subject:
Estoppel Query
The
trouble with the Canadian cases, at least from my perspective, is
that they do not use the concept of estoppel or detrimental reliance
in any explicit fashion. What I was hoping to find was an explicit
judicial or academic discussion of this possibility?
Are
Andrew Robertson or Lizzie Cooke lurking out there?
-----
Original Message -----
From: Phil Lister
Date: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 11:15 pm
Subject: Re: Estoppel Query
To: Jason Neyers
Can I add to that CNR vs The Norsk and London Drugs
vs Nagel, both SCC decisions reported around 97-98 DLR (3rd)?.Also
the older English case of Scruttons vs Midlands, a decision
of Lord Denning and the HL in about 1962, for the older traditional
view.
--
Jason Neyers
January Term Director
Associate Professor of Law
Faculty of Law
University of Western Ontario
N6A 3K7
(519) 661-2111 x. 88435
<<<<
Previous Message ~ Index ~ Next
Message >>>>>
|