![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
From
what I remember of undergrad conflicts in 1992, the rule from Penn's
case
- that an English court adjudicating in matters of equity,
operates on the conscience of the defendant ( ex hypothesi present in
the jurisdiction) and not so "directly" on the title to the foreign land
outside the J as to infringe any principles of comity-
would allow a claim lie that in Polly Peck to
proceed, in spite of the title to foreign land principle from Mocambique.
Paul Michalik <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |