Scots Law (Lionel Smith, 13 Oct 1998)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Lionel Smith
Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 1998 09:39:32
Re:	Scots Law

In the new LQR (Oct 98): Parker Hood, "Unjustified Enrichment in Scots Law: A Further Step Towards Rationalisation" (1998) 114 LQR 559, noting Shilliday v. Smith 1998 S.L.T. 976, definitively recognising a general principle of unjustified enrichment in Scots law.

Lionel

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.