Confidentiality in SCC (Lionel Smith, 29 Jan 1999)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Lionel Smith
Date:	Fri, 29 Jan 1999 13:18:40
Re:	Confidentiality in SCC

Released yesterday is the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Cadbury Schweppes Inc. v. FBI Foods Ltd., the great Clamato case (a reference which only Canadians are likely to understand) (and those Canadians living in England may be interested to hear that some branches of Sainsbury's stock this "confection" (per Binnie J)). There is a great deal on the remedies available for breach of confidence.

The judgment is on line at ‹http://www.droit.umontreal.ca/doc/csc-scc/ en/rec/html/fbi.en.html›.

Lionel

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.