Charles Mitchell (charles.mitchell@kcl.ac.uk)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Charles Mitchell
Date:	Fri, 12 Feb 1999 11:21:57
Re:	LSUC v. TD Bank

Andrew Little has written to me, to point out that the Ont. CA's decisions are now on-line. The LSUC v. TD Bank case is at

www.ontariocourts.on.ca/decisions/1998/december/ lsuc_dec07.htm

Ken Oliphant has also written to suggest that in the Aliakmon type problem the buyer might have an action against the thief in the tort of unlawful interference with trade or business by unlawful means.

______________________________
Dr Charles Mitchell
Lecturer in Law
School of Law
King's College London
Strand
LONDON WC2R 2LS

tel: 0171 873 2290
fax: 0171 873 2465

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.