Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
David A Kreltszheim
Date:
Wed, 28 Apr 1999 20:24:57 +1000
Re:
Tracing - Australian Resources

 

Also in response to Lionel's plea:

Sutherland (In the Matter of Scutts) [1999] FCA 147 (Federal Court of Australia, Sackville J, 25 February 1999): Bankruptcy - creditors' claim in respect of bullion acquired on their behalf by bankrupt - no tracing possible - whether any class of creditors entitled to priority. Among other things, this discusses Space Investments and Gummow J's dissenting judgment in Stephenson Nominees. The full text of the case is available at

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/ federal_ct/1999/ 147.html

(Risking the charge of immodesty): David Kreltszheim, "Tracing Electronic Cash: Fraud and the Electronic Transfer and Storage of Value" (1999) 27 Australian Business Law Review pp 112-141. This considers how the tracing rules may be applied where a fraud is perpetrated by using internet payment systems (such as the DigiCash system used in Australia by St George Bank) or by accessing the value stored in smartcards (such as Mondex). The current generation of internet "cash" payment systems are characterised as mechanisms for the transfer of bank money and, with the aid of some crucial assumptions, Mondex value is characterised as being analogous to chattel money. The differences between following chattel money and tracing bank money make these characterisations important.

 

David Kreltszheim
Senior Associate, KPMG Legal
161 Collins Street Melbourne
Victoria Australia
Fax: +61 3 9288 6287
Tel: +61 3 9288 6309

"This email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. When addressed to our clients, any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return email or telephone +61 2 9335 7000 and destroy the original message. Thank you."


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !