Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
Gerard McMeel
Date:
Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:10:46
Re:
Archer and Innocent Donees

 

Sorry to revive this topic, but there is a spin on this which I believe was not raised.

I was perusing Michael Crick's very readable biography of JA this morning, "Stranger than Fiction". This reminded me (at p 307 of the hardback) that the main beneficiaries of Archer's libel damages were Cheltenham Ladies' College and two Cambridge colleges (of which the fragrant Mary was alumnus), together with Brasenose College, Oxford (of which Jeffrey is a quasi-alumnus) and Ely Cathedral.

Personally I am somewhat sceptical that any cause of action exists, unless the Daily Star can establish bad faith bringing of civil suit or can succeed on an out-of-time appeal to the Court of Appeal. However, on the assumption that the right exists (and further assuming JA's appearance of wealth is all a sham) would the claim extend to the innocent donees? This would test people's views on the reach of Diplock. Presumably the efficacy of change of position would be significant.

 ----------------------
Gerard McMeel


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !