![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
There
is a headnote (but not a judgment, yet) of the Fishel
case in New Law Online.
Non-UK members might also be interested to learn that another claim to
profits appeared in the weekend newspapers here, relating to "renegade
spy" David Shayler, a former MI5 agent who now lives in Paris. The UK
government failed in earlier attempts to have him extradited and they
are now suing him civilly for breaches of contract, confidence and copyright.
There is also a claim against one of the newspapers which published Shayler's
allegations/revelations. Accounts of profits are sought against both defendants.
The government appears to be arguing that the information supplied by
Shayler is crown copyright, which seems a bit ambitious. Can information
be copyright, or only a particular manifestation of it? Perhaps the argument
is that any time an MI5 agent conveys secret information, the manifestation
is ipso facto crown copyright since (s)he is or was a servant of the Crown.
Lionel <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |