![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
The
Court of Appeal today gave judgment in BCCI
Overseas v. Akindele. This case has restates the test for "knowing receipt"
liability . The judge at first instance applied a test of dishonesty. BCCI
(the Appellants) argued that the test extended to constructive knowledge/notice.
The CA has laid down its own test:
"All that is necessary is that the recipient's state
of knowledge should be such as to make it unconscionable for him to retain
the benefit of the receipt."
I expect that the transcript will be available through
the usual channels shortly.
Felicity Toube <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |