The best 3 or 4 tort/UE interface cases (Gerard McMeel, 11 Aug 2000)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	Gerard McMeel
Date:	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:33:00 +0100
Re:	The best 3 or 4 tort/UE interface cases

United Australia v Barclays Bank [1941] AC 1
The Universe Sentinel [1983] 1 AC 366
Stoke on Trent City Council v Wass [1988] 1 WLR 1406

These illustrate the main principles and difficulties. I hesitate to suggest any of the instalments in the Phillips v Homfray saga.

Gerard McMeel

On Wed, 09 Aug 2000 16:31:21 -0400 Jason Neyers wrote:

Dear All,

Given the excellent response that I received last time, I thought that I would use this board's expertise one more time. Does anyone have any suggestions as to the best 3 or 4 cases dealing with the interface/overlap between UE and tort? Thank-you in advance for any suggestions.

Sincerely,

Jason Neyers

--
Jason Neyers
Assistant Professor
Faculty of Law
The University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario
N6A 3K7
(519) 661-2111 x. 88435

----------------------
Gerard McMeel

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.