![]() |
RDG
online Restitution Discussion Group Archives |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
Also of interest to the group and published today is:
Proprietary Remedies in Context "There is a tension in English law between the idea that
the courts might provide a remedy by creating new property rights and
the understanding that the judiciary's role is limited to the protection
of existing proprietary interests with the power to redistribute property
residing in the legislature alone. While there are numerous instances
in which the courts intervene to readjust property rights, these are disguised
in metaphor and fiction. However, this has meant that the law in this
area has developed without open consideration of justifications for redistributing
property. The result of this is that there is little coherence in the
law of proprietary remedies as a whole and a good deal of it is indefensible.
The book examines redistributive processes such as tracing, subrogation
and proprietary estoppel and the use of the constructive trust in the
context of contracts to assign property, vitiated transactions, the profits
of wrongdoing and the breakdown of intimate relationships. It contrasts
the English treatment of this area of law with developments in other common
law jurisdictions where a more dynamic understanding of property has permitted
more open acknowledgement of the judicial role in redistributing proprietary
rights."
Steve Hedley
============================================= ansaphone : +44 1223 334931 Christ's College Cambridge CB2 3BU <== Previous message Back to index Next message ==> |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
» » » » » |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |