Obligations Discussion Group (John Blackie, 24 Jun 2002)

Of course it's just a tree. What does it look like ?

RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

Sender:	John Blackie
Date:	Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:35:26 +0100
Re:	Obligations Discussion Group

Can you add me to it? I agree with Francis Rose that it would be a pity if it were to cover restitution/unjustified enrichment. The Restitution Discussion Group provides a really good service on that area.

John Blackie

-----Original Message-----
From: Enrichment - Restitution & Unjust Enrichment Legal Issues
[mailto:ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA]On Behalf Of Francis Rose
Sent: 21 June 2002 15:52
To: ENRICHMENT@LISTS.MCGILL.CA
Subject: Re: [RDG:] Obligations Discussion Group

Please add me to the group. I hope that it will avoid Restitution. The RDG is firmly established as the home for this and it will make life more, rather than less, difficult if we have rivalry and duplication.

Francis Rose
University of Bristol

<== Previous message Back to index Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "

»
»
»
»
»

For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.