Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
Neil Guthrie
Date:
Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:34:36 -0500
Re:
Serhan v. Johnson & Johnson

 

The Ontario Court of Appeal has refused leave to appeal the decision of the Divisional Court (where the judges divided on the viability of a claim based on waiver of tort).

Where this leaves us is not entirely clear: although the merits of such a claim might conceivably be determined in the Serhan class action, it is almost certain that the parties will settle before an actual trial of the issues. Other products liability claims have been drafted (or amended) to reflect Serhan, so perhaps the status in Ontario of waiver of tort will be decided in one of those.

Neil Guthrie

Stikeman Elliott LLP
Toronto, Canada


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !