Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
Robert Chambers
Date:
Mon, 24 Jul 2000 09:18:07 -0600
Re:
Profit from crime

 

Canada's National Post reported today (Monday, 24 July 2000, page A3) that the California Supreme Court has been asked to declare that a California statute, which prevents criminals from profiting from their crimes, is unconstitutional because it infringes the right to free speech. The appellant is Barry Keenan, who kidnapped Frank Sinatra Jr in 1961 and sold the rights to his story to Columbia Pictures last year for $1.5M. The victim used the statute to prevent Keenan from receiving the money. According to the article, 42 American states have a similar law and the NY law was declared unconstitutional in 1991. The law does not prevent the criminal from giving her or his story away. The issue is whether the inability to get paid for the story is a deterrent to free speech.

 

Robert Chambers
University of Alberta
Faculty of Law


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !